Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 05:33:15 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r185499 - head Message-ID: <20081201133315.GE27096@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <49338E98.7020104@freebsd.org> References: <200812010045.mB10jpmX007146@svn.freebsd.org> <49338E98.7020104@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> [081130 23:13] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >Author: alfred > >Date: Mon Dec 1 00:45:51 2008 > >New Revision: 185499 > >URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/185499 > > > >Log: > > Provide a 'tinderbox' target that compiles enough of FreeBSD that > > a developer can rest reasonably assured that the tinderbox will not > > be broken. This target leverages most of 'universe' but will exit > > non-zero and output a summary at the end. > > > > "make tinderbox" > > Excellent! > > I seem to recall that the "real" tinderbox uses > some slightly different build options from > "make universe." > > It would be nice to reconcile that. I'm hoping that DES will be forthcoming if such discrepancies exist so that we can reconcile them. Right now, from what I understand, he says that this is close enough to a tinderbox run to be useful. The only thing I didn't like was that it picks up all kernels sitting in my source tree. I should probably fix the 'tinderbox' target not to pick up my own kernels. Let me know what you think about that. -- - Alfred Perlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081201133315.GE27096>