Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 06:30:59 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 Makefile at_exit.9 at_fork.9 style.9 Message-ID: <20030326061724.A20206@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200303251636.h2PGalZK071255@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200303251636.h2PGalZK071255@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> jhb 2003/03/25 08:36:47 PST
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> share/man/man9 Makefile style.9
> Removed files:
> share/man/man9 at_exit.9 at_fork.9
> Log:
> Remove obsolete at_fork() and at_exit() manpages. Curiously, at_exec()
> didn't have a manpage.
>
> Reminded by: ru
I thought that ru reminded us to document new interfaces at least as well
as the ones that they replaced.
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.176 +1 -4 src/share/man/man9/Makefile
> 1.19 +0 -74 src/share/man/man9/at_exit.9 (dead)
> 1.19 +0 -78 src/share/man/man9/at_fork.9 (dead)
> 1.99 +1 -1 src/share/man/man9/style.9
^^^^^^^
The change to style.9 has nothing to do with at_fork() or at_exit().
It just backs out one of the fixes in rev.1.95. Curiously, the reason
for this fix is mentioned in the log message.
Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030326061724.A20206>