Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 May 2013 16:57:41 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        David Christensen <davidch@broadcom.com>
Cc:        Herve Boulouis <amon@aelita.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>
Subject:   Re: Support of Dell M620 broadcom BCM57810
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmomKnA0EZ2RXmtrgRx10Ut93gEu3ZdM_P3fUhqT5rHy59g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36E8C3@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References:  <20130529131313.GA24559@ra.aabs> <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36DE66@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20130530093137.GB24559@ra.aabs> <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36E8C3@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Would you guys mind dumping it into a github repo or something, so the
community can test it out?



Adrian

On 30 May 2013 16:48, David Christensen <davidch@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> I'll be glad to test but I'd like to know :
>>
>> - do you require testing on -head or -stable ?
>
> Tested with 9.1 and 10.0-Current.  Open to patches on earlier kernels for
> the brave.
>
>> - in your opinion in which shape is the current code ? I mean how far are we
>> from something more or less ready to put
>> in production ?
>
> It's not extensively tested across all NICs yet (BCM57711E in an HP blade
> system, BCM57810 w/ 10GBase-T PHY, etc. ) so some hardware specific
> combinations may not work, but otherwise it's in good shape.
> Really just needs some wider test before committing to the kernel.
>
>
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomKnA0EZ2RXmtrgRx10Ut93gEu3ZdM_P3fUhqT5rHy59g>