Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:50:49 -0800
From:      John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
To:        Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
Message-ID:  <20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
In-Reply-To: <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.

  Read the users email.  They're using specific tags, not "." so there are
(or may be) some differences as time elapses.


help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115135049.GA27992>