Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:31:10 +0200 From: Alexey Tyurikov <alexey.tyurikov@gmail.com> To: Kristof Provost <kristof@sigsegv.be> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS over NFS issue with linux clients Message-ID: <CANJVYoJwobEk%2BPMaLDco8krsRsa-JsfkxqDUkVf8v%2B4MED=XqQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121018093517.GS9028@thebe.jupiter.sigsegv.be> References: <CANJVYoLWWPDJ0r=RnWiSnUTKnY3AD5K-LL6QkWQecmuqjVLw0Q@mail.gmail.com> <20121018093517.GS9028@thebe.jupiter.sigsegv.be>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, I can confirm, the issue doesn't exist on FreeBSD 9.1. Affected releases: 8.3, 9.0 @Kristof: thank you for the answer! do you use 9.1 in production? Best regards Alexey 2012/10/18 Kristof Provost <kristof@sigsegv.be> > On 2012-10-18 10:50:25 (+0200), Alexey Tyurikov <alexey.tyurikov@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm looking for people using FreeBSD 9.0 amd64 ZFS over NFS (v3 and v4) > > with Linux clients. My clients (last CentOS6 and Debian6) don't use cache > > for files lying on ZFS over NFS. Tested: > > > > $ grep something /nfs_zfs/file-100MB # network activity, client read the > > file over NFS (slow) > > $ grep something /nfs_zfs/file-100MB # network activity, client read the > > file over NFS once again (slow) > > > I'm unable to reproduce this behaviour with a Debian 6.0 client (ARM, > because my openrd is the only client I can get to at the moment). That's > a 2.6.32-5-kirkwood kernel. > > The server is FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #91 r241441 (amd64). I can't > easily compare to UFS, because the server is ZFS only. > > I see network activity on the first read, but only very little (a single > getattr + reply in fact) on the second read. > > Regards, > Kristof > > -- Alexey Tyurikov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANJVYoJwobEk%2BPMaLDco8krsRsa-JsfkxqDUkVf8v%2B4MED=XqQ>