Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 02:24:18 +1000 From: Scott Aitken <scott@thismonkey.com> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-arm Digest, Vol 419, Issue 7 Message-ID: <20140502162417.GA79349@utility-01.thismonkey.com> In-Reply-To: <mailman.763.1399030527.1244.freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> References: <mailman.763.1399030527.1244.freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:35:27AM +0000, freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org wrote: > On 05/01/14 01:34, Johny Mattsson wrote: > > On 1 May 2014 00:14, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> I was doing some testing on a wandboard (about twice as fast an an rpi) > >> with > >> more than 20k int/sec without having any problems. > >> > > > > On a similar note, I've pushed an i.MX 283 (400MHz) board to above 300k > > int/sec, on Linux. Admittedly at that point my shell wasn't what you'd call > > "responsive" however =) The ISR in that scenario was the GPIO handler, so > > probably a bit more light-weight than an audio ISR. > > Hi, > > I'll have a look and see if I can fix it. > > --HPS I'd be happy to test if necessary. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140502162417.GA79349>