Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:08:35 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: kris@FreeBSD.org, sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/24065: sysinstall uses different crypto scheme from installed system Message-ID: <20010327120835.B17852@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010327115654F.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:56:54AM -0800 References: <200103271854.f2RIsXw18543@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010327115654F.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:56:54AM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > Any particular upside to assigning closed PRs? I'm not sure I see it. :) General tidyness, plus the fact that if it gets reopened for whatever unlikely reason, there's someone to deal with it. Sometimes PRs get closed and then the submitter replies with additional information which changes things, or whatever. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6wPNCWry0BWjoQKURAisRAKDf21BD33HpoPYnF9SjZtuc1LIMOgCeNcIP FX+iegZoY1OP05d9vL1pL58= =SyCL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010327120835.B17852>