Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 May 2018 14:44:31 -0500
From:      Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc:        "Jonathan T. Looney" <jtl@freebsd.org>, Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>,  John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r334104 - in head/sys: netinet sys
Message-ID:  <954ca6de-43dd-af9a-2ab1-2786473de611@vangyzen.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180524044746.GX71675@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201805231700.w4NH05hs047395@repo.freebsd.org> <2281830.zrSQodBeDb@ralph.baldwin.cx> <CAPrugNo8_h5jnn2Yt250ZH1crwxHhK46QK1vfdyWssYjuuSAqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADrOrmtmSYtMt4vrqdFHrLqAArBaws8bAeynPa8X_sz7ui86uw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGudoHFi6T3tNCy8NUq=oF6h_4=i0cc3peiD%2BE5-NRYKQZX9Tg@mail.gmail.com> <20180524044746.GX71675@FreeBSD.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 05/23/2018 23:47, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:44:20AM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> M> I fundamentally disagree with this part.
> M>
> M> If a known value of a given field is needed for assertion purposes, you
> M> can add (possibly conditional) code setting this specific value. It
> M> probably should not be zero if it can be helped.
> M>
> M> Conditional zeroing of the *whole* struct depending on invariants will
> M> *hide* uninitialized memory read bugs - production kernel will have
> M> whatever it happens to find, while *debug* kernel will guarantee to
> M> have all the values zeroed. In fact the flag actively combats redzoning.
> M> if the resulting allocation is zeroed, poisoning is actively neutered.
> M> But only if debug is enabled.
> M>
> M> That said, I find the change harmful.
> 
> +1 on fundamentally disagree with M_ZERO_INVARIANTS. It makes the
> INVARIANTS-enabled kernels to crash _later_ than production kernels,
> since instead of uma_junk it places clean zeroes.

Matt,

Mateusz and Gleb raise very good points.  This operates contrary to the 
whole idea of INVARIANTS.  Please revisit this.

Eric


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?954ca6de-43dd-af9a-2ab1-2786473de611>