Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 20:10:53 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel J. O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Subject: Re: more modular rc/init/uninit system... Message-ID: <XFMail.990203201053.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902020758270.4779-100000@nomad.dataplex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02-Feb-99 Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > Let me suggest that we "indirect" the script files one level (ala > autoconfig). > For each package, we create <package>.rc which has the guts of the scripts > and the dependancies. When we add, delete, or change a package, we rerun > the startup configurer which rewrites the actual scripts as needed. Hmm.. I don't really see what it gains you. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990203201053.doconnor>