Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:55:27 -0500 From: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move scsuspend()/scresume() forward to EVENTHANDLERs Message-ID: <BANLkTimFgZpngzfT05iqWscOH1t9WoJOTg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201104191624.17677.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110420003133.4dc391f6.taku@tackymt.homeip.net> <BANLkTikBxPq5xG1v_KzFszxkLO44UKzxGw@mail.gmail.com> <EEFD8EF7-35C7-422B-AF3A-60004630089C@bsdimp.com> <201104191624.17677.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 April 2011 04:02 pm, Warner Losh wrote: >> Having chased boogiemen in this area before, I think this patch >> makes good sense even though it breaks the device model a little. >> However, the hardware in question really is special on x86... >> >> Warner > > Actually I was working on a similar patch and it should be ready soon. > > Jung-uk Kim You have a willing (if not completely capable) tester here, so I always look forward to your patches. As the situation has greatly improved, I hesitate to even say this, but...I wish the USB stack could be made to be suspend/resume resilient. It's really the only problem child in my laptop. Fortunately, it's easy enough to build the USB stack as modules and unload/reload them. -Brandonhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTimFgZpngzfT05iqWscOH1t9WoJOTg>