Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 11:14:35 -0400 From: Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com> To: Niall Smart <njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk>, Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> Cc: eivind@yes.no, dima@best.net, jayrich@room101.sysc.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd securelevel patch question Message-ID: <19980615111435.A348@mstar.astro.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: <E0ylXMP-0003KN-00@oak71.doc.ic.ac.uk>; from Niall Smart on Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 12:23:37PM %2B0100 References: <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> <E0ylXMP-0003KN-00@oak71.doc.ic.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 12:23:37PM +0100, Niall Smart wrote: > > btw, using the immutable flag(s) without setting the securelevel > 0 is > > fruitless as raw device access remains open... > > 1 you mean. > > Secure level 0 is insecure mode. Yes, so securelevel > 0, or securelevel >= 1. -- Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com> * Stay close to the Vorlon. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/pgp.key for PGP public key 0x67203349. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980615111435.A348>