Date: 28 Mar 2000 11:35:42 -0600 From: Soren Dayton <dayton@overx.com> To: "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jgowdy@home.com> Cc: "Martin Cracauer" <cracauer@cons.org>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Message-ID: <868zz3m1zl.fsf@polo.overx.com> In-Reply-To: "Jeremiah Gowdy"'s message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:38:48 -0800" References: <20000328113633.A28085@cons.org> <002301bf98dc$79ed86e0$0100000a@vista1.sdca.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there a good list of improvements? In particular details of the NFS improvements? I tried looking through the CVS logs, but it was not immediately clear to me. And doing that for the entire source tree doesn't seem very efficient. Thanks, Soren "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jgowdy@home.com> writes: > I'll agree with most of the points you made. When 3.4 was all there was, I > was content with it, because I've known nothing else. But after seeing how > beautiful 4.0 can be in certain areas, (my favs are new linux emu threads > and ATAPI rather than wd0), I would hate to go back to 3.4. In fact, I'm > upgrading my work's mission critical computer to 4.0-RELEASE. I really > think it's _alot_ better (as it should be, since it's a X.0 release). My > opinion, although what people do with their time is none of my business, is > that it would be best to have everyone concentrate their efforts on 4.0. > Just my little opinion :) > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868zz3m1zl.fsf>