Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:51:30 +0200 From: "Attilio Rao" <attilio@freebsd.org> To: "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: smp@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: take 2: request for review: backport of sx and rwlocks from 7.0 to 6-stable Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10709191251t2322c063x1659a38e5f9df8b9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200709191106.28974.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20070904023152.GZ87451@elvis.mu.org> <200709191106.28974.jhb@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
2007/9/19, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>: > Why did you remove the 'show sleepq' DDB command completely? It's very > useful. :( Honestly, if there is something I really dislike in this MFC, except the removal of 'show sleepq' command is the backporting of lock_profile architecture. It shouldn't have been happened. it is still not mature for 7.0 I think and kmacy is going to replace with a better mechanism for 8.0 certainly. So Alfred, if it is feasible for you, can you remove the lock_profile backporting from 6.0? I'm going to help you with this if you find any trouble. Respect, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einsteinhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10709191251t2322c063x1659a38e5f9df8b9>