Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:37:22 -0800 From: Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net> To: Matthias Buelow <token@wuff.mayn.de> Cc: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>, Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... Message-ID: <19991126103722.A8292@mushhaven.net> In-Reply-To: <19991126121732.B27425@wuff.mayn.de> References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.9911251001220.27351-100000@tricord.system.pl> <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> <19991126121732.B27425@wuff.mayn.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:17:32PM +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Forrest W. Christian wrote: > > > -current (all the latest greatest experimental). > > -stable (all the latest gretest "Stable" stuff). > > -missioncritical (conservative release, once a year or so - only bug > >fixes after release). > > Hmm... wouldn't that degrade -stable and disqualify it for applications > that are mission critical and for which it would be well suited? > People would probably be very confused and ask why something that > isn't mission critical is tagged "stable". I thought that was what -release was, bugfixes and security issues only? Jamie > > mkb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991126103722.A8292>