Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:37:22 -0800
From:      Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net>
To:        Matthias Buelow <token@wuff.mayn.de>
Cc:        "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>, Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: speaking of 3.4...
Message-ID:  <19991126103722.A8292@mushhaven.net>
In-Reply-To: <19991126121732.B27425@wuff.mayn.de>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.20.9911251001220.27351-100000@tricord.system.pl> <Pine.BSF.3.96.991125105436.21715A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> <19991126121732.B27425@wuff.mayn.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:17:32PM +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> 
> > -current (all the latest greatest experimental).
> > -stable (all the latest gretest "Stable" stuff).
> > -missioncritical (conservative release, once a year or so - only bug
> >fixes after release).
> 
> Hmm... wouldn't that degrade -stable and disqualify it for applications
> that are mission critical and for which it would be well suited?
> People would probably be very confused and ask why something that
> isn't mission critical is tagged "stable".

I thought that was what -release was, bugfixes and security issues only?


Jamie

> 
> mkb


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991126103722.A8292>