Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:30:35 -0300 (BRT) From: "Giovanni P. Tirloni" <gpt@tirloni.org> To: "Aaron Glenn" <aaron.glenn@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd ataraid situation Message-ID: <1824.201.11.22.205.1121139035.squirrel@webmail.bs2.com.br> In-Reply-To: <18f601940507112010726ecd13@mail.gmail.com> References: <1473.201.11.22.205.1121134115.squirrel@webmail.bs2.com.br> <18f601940507112010726ecd13@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aaron Glenn disse: > On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni <gpt@tirloni.org> wrote: >> But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the >> RAID1 >> array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work >> like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :) > > What is the advantage of building a faulty array? I'd be able to work on this server right now and add the second disk when it arrives without reinstalling everything. I'm not complaining or anything.. I know it's not a commom situation and I'm already looking for something that doesn't involve such hack (suck as waiting the second disk). It's late and I can't think about anything that would make my system installed on ad4 to become ar0 (ad4+ad6) without much work and another spare disk as a temporary storage. -- Giovanni P. Tirloni
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1824.201.11.22.205.1121139035.squirrel>