Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 08:30:13 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: ULE and current. Message-ID: <20031207082612.D4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Now that 5.2 has been branched I will soon be making ULE the default scheduler in GENERIC. I'm hoping that before I throw the switch I'll get more feedback from current users. The only big change I have in the pipeline for ULE is improved HTT support. This has all been coded and tested locally. I'm going to commit this after things settle down on HEAD a little more. The plan is to leave ULE as the default until we get to 5.3 at which point we will decide whether or not it is production quality. The most untest workload that I know of is on massive multiuser systems with lots of interactive tasks. If anyone has such a system, I would love to hear of feedback while running ULE. For anyone else, if your workload is either improved or hindered, I'd appreciate a mail with the a description of your workload, your hardware, behavior with ULE, and behavior with 4BSD. Thanks, Jeff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031207082612.D4201-100000>