Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:01:15 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net> Cc: "Yann Sommer" <yann@yann.de>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not stick with [STABLE] [Was: RE: Releases] Message-ID: <15059.4651.149885.809111@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20010410012424.02b2f580@207.227.119.2> References: <BPEHKNFLJKCIDDNDIOAKKEOCCCAA.yann@yann.de> <4.3.2.20010410012424.02b2f580@207.227.119.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeffrey J. Mountin <jeff-ml@mountin.net> types: > The concept of how the naming is done is not an issue and cannot be solved > by using a different or modified scheme. Rather the documentation should > cover this. Quite right. The problem we're trying to solve is dealing with questions from people who don't know that > Just a matter of explaining what each period means in the > handbook and/or/both the FAQ... As you note, it's already there: > Then again if anyone perpetuating this thread had bothered to pay attention > to the list (RYFM) and check out Nik's last message would know about: > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/book.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE > > and might find: > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/book.html#STABLE > > Think that covers it... <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15059.4651.149885.809111>