Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:07:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device probing... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009120807460.71155-100000@beppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpem2poq4n.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
One could do this. On 12 Sep 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes: > > Good idea, except it's hard to debug unless you have a working ddb or gdb or > > something (which is very rare these days for the machines I usually work on). > > Make the message spooler conditional on DEBUG not being defined. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009120807460.71155-100000>