Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 20:00:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Chip Marshall <chip@chocobo.cx> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020508195149.85339K-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20020508210030.GA53266@chocobo.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Chip Marshall wrote: > On May 08, 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. sent me the following: > > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 06:55:16PM +0000, George Cox wrote: > > > We have mailwrapper(1). How about perlwrapper(1)?! h0h0h0 > > > > mailwrapper is because FreeBSD comes with an MTA though. > > Speaking of which, if we want to rip perl out of the base system, why > not rip sendmail out too? Allow it to be an install-time option as to > which MTA to use, be it sendmail, postfix, qmail, or whathaveyou. This isn't a general discussion of architecture. This is a specific discussion of one piece of software. Rather than drag in the larger decision making issue, let's make progress on this one issue and deal with the rest later. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020508195149.85339K-100000>