Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:32:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> To: markmi@dsl-only.net Cc: linimon@lonesome.com, freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work Message-ID: <201708302332.v7UNWSVY073465@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <AC842DDA-EB6F-419F-AA02-DF0A6E3BEFEF@dsl-only.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 Aug, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from
>>> emulators/qemu-user-static are broken.
>>
>> Correct, and known for some time. (fwiw sparc64 hangs as well.)
>
> Looks like qemu-ppc64-static is stuck in a loop, calling
> repeatedly:
>
> do_freebsd_syscall (cpu_env=0x860ea3ac0, num=58, arg1=14, arg2=35995509911, arg3=1024, arg4=268435904, arg5=281494784, arg6=35985701568, arg7=515, arg8=35985668288)
> at /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/qemu-user-static/work/qemu-bsd-user-17977d0/bsd-user/syscall.c:210
> 210 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/qemu-user-static/work/qemu-bsd-user-17977d0/bsd-user/syscall.c: No such file or directory.
>
> Which is for:
>
> 58 AUE_READLINK STD { ssize_t readlink(char *path, char *buf, \
> size_t count); }
>
> As confirmed by (note the "callq 0x60207360 <readlink>" ):
>
> (gdb)
> lock_user_string (guest_addr=14) at /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/qemu-user-static/work/qemu-bsd-user-17977d0/bsd-user/qemu.h:508
> 508 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/emulators/qemu-user-static/work/qemu-bsd-user-17977d0/bsd-user/qemu.h: No such file or directory.
>
> (gdb) x/64i 0x0000000060045d3e
> => 0x60045d3e <do_freebsd_syscall+3246>: callq 0x6004fd20 <target_strlen>
> 0x60045d43 <do_freebsd_syscall+3251>: test %rax,%rax
> 0x60045d46 <do_freebsd_syscall+3254>: js 0x6004b99c <do_freebsd_syscall+26892>
> 0x60045d4c <do_freebsd_syscall+3260>: inc %rax
> 0x60045d4f <do_freebsd_syscall+3263>: mov $0x1,%edx
> 0x60045d54 <do_freebsd_syscall+3268>: mov %rbx,%rdi
> 0x60045d57 <do_freebsd_syscall+3271>: mov %rax,%rsi
> 0x60045d5a <do_freebsd_syscall+3274>: callq 0x6003c430 <page_check_range>
> 0x60045d5f <do_freebsd_syscall+3279>: test %eax,%eax
> 0x60045d61 <do_freebsd_syscall+3281>: jne 0x6004bce4 <do_freebsd_syscall+27732>
> 0x60045d67 <do_freebsd_syscall+3287>: add 0x26d91b2(%rip),%rbx # 0x6271ef20 <guest_base>
> 0x60045d6e <do_freebsd_syscall+3294>: je 0x6004bce4 <do_freebsd_syscall+27732>
> 0x60045d74 <do_freebsd_syscall+3300>: mov $0x3,%edx
> 0x60045d79 <do_freebsd_syscall+3305>: mov -0x2a8(%rbp),%r14
> 0x60045d80 <do_freebsd_syscall+3312>: mov %r14,%rdi
> 0x60045d83 <do_freebsd_syscall+3315>: mov %r12,%rsi
> 0x60045d86 <do_freebsd_syscall+3318>: callq 0x6003c430 <page_check_range>
> 0x60045d8b <do_freebsd_syscall+3323>: test %eax,%eax
> 0x60045d8d <do_freebsd_syscall+3325>: jne 0x6004bce4 <do_freebsd_syscall+27732>
> 0x60045d93 <do_freebsd_syscall+3331>: add 0x26d9186(%rip),%r14 # 0x6271ef20 <guest_base>
> 0x60045d9a <do_freebsd_syscall+3338>: mov -0x294(%rbp),%r10d
> 0x60045da1 <do_freebsd_syscall+3345>: mov $0xfffffffffffffff2,%r13
> 0x60045da8 <do_freebsd_syscall+3352>: je 0x6004bcf2 <do_freebsd_syscall+27746>
> 0x60045dae <do_freebsd_syscall+3358>: mov $0x602b93da,%esi
> 0x60045db3 <do_freebsd_syscall+3363>: mov %rbx,%rdi
> 0x60045db6 <do_freebsd_syscall+3366>: callq 0x60230af0 <strcmp>
> 0x60045dbb <do_freebsd_syscall+3371>: test %eax,%eax
> 0x60045dbd <do_freebsd_syscall+3373>: je 0x6004c566 <do_freebsd_syscall+29910>
> 0x60045dc3 <do_freebsd_syscall+3379>: mov %rbx,%rdi
> 0x60045dc6 <do_freebsd_syscall+3382>: callq 0x60158660 <path>
> 0x60045dcb <do_freebsd_syscall+3387>: mov %rax,%rdi
> 0x60045dce <do_freebsd_syscall+3390>: mov %r14,%rsi
> 0x60045dd1 <do_freebsd_syscall+3393>: mov %r12,%rdx
> 0x60045dd4 <do_freebsd_syscall+3396>: callq 0x60207360 <readlink>
>
> But note that the "lock_user_string (guest_addr=14)" and
> "do_freebsd_syscall (cpu_env=0x860ea3ac0, num=58, arg1=14,"
> indicate that the "readlink(char *path," is using a really
> small address for the path string.
>
>
> I've not figured a way for poudriere bulk builds to leave
> behind the source code automatically. So far I've not
> looked at the qemu-bsd-user source code. I do build with
> both debug and optimization turned on via bsd.port.mk
> having:
The -w option will create a tarball of the work directory if the
package build fails. I also often use the testport -i option I want to
poke around in the WRKDIR after a build.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201708302332.v7UNWSVY073465>