Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 17:07:10 -0300 (ART) From: Hugo Pagola <hpagola@cactus.fi.uba.ar> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wireless Services Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970708165442.13291C-100000@cactus.fi.uba.ar> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970708105308.869i-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Hugo Pagola wrote: > > > > > The Breezecom stuff is nice because it > > > > does multi-rate (it goes to lower throughput if it can't make it at 3 > > > > Mbps). However, compared to the Freewave radios they are pretty deaf (fine > > > > for indoor use, but bad for long outdoor links). > > > > > > We are currently testing Breezecom's ``stuff'' over the same 12 mile > > > leg in my original message, currently waiting on the attenna climber > > > to crawl up the mast and deploy the 2.4GHz yagi. A quick little > > > test says we could here the transmitter okay. > > > > > > > I've an offer for solitek wireless cards that claim to be wavelan > > compatible. > > anybody test this card?. > > The Breezecom stuff is configured with the some driver than wavelan? > > Breezecom make standalone ethernet/radio adaptors. A station adaptor > plugs into the ethernet on the FreeBSD box. Downside of breezecom is > that two station adaptors can't talk to each other without going through > a hub. > > Danny > Yes, but what driver do you use in the freebsd box for the breezecom cards? is the same than wavelan? thanks Hugo Pagolahome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970708165442.13291C-100000>