Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 17:07:10 -0300 (ART) From: Hugo Pagola <hpagola@cactus.fi.uba.ar> To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wireless Services Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970708165442.13291C-100000@cactus.fi.uba.ar> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970708105308.869i-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Hugo Pagola wrote: > > > > > The Breezecom stuff is nice because it > > > > does multi-rate (it goes to lower throughput if it can't make it at 3 > > > > Mbps). However, compared to the Freewave radios they are pretty deaf (fine > > > > for indoor use, but bad for long outdoor links). > > > > > > We are currently testing Breezecom's ``stuff'' over the same 12 mile > > > leg in my original message, currently waiting on the attenna climber > > > to crawl up the mast and deploy the 2.4GHz yagi. A quick little > > > test says we could here the transmitter okay. > > > > > > > I've an offer for solitek wireless cards that claim to be wavelan > > compatible. > > anybody test this card?. > > The Breezecom stuff is configured with the some driver than wavelan? > > Breezecom make standalone ethernet/radio adaptors. A station adaptor > plugs into the ethernet on the FreeBSD box. Downside of breezecom is > that two station adaptors can't talk to each other without going through > a hub. > > Danny > Yes, but what driver do you use in the freebsd box for the breezecom cards? is the same than wavelan? thanks Hugo Pagola
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970708165442.13291C-100000>