Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:35:04 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r185499 - head Message-ID: <863ah8qarb.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20081201132554.GD27096@elvis.mu.org> (Alfred Perlstein's message of "Mon, 1 Dec 2008 05:25:54 -0800") References: <200812010045.mB10jpmX007146@svn.freebsd.org> <49338E98.7020104@freebsd.org> <863ah8rvcd.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20081201132554.GD27096@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> writes: > If you strongly believe that a target should return "true" on failure > and/or output "i worked" on failure I don't, and I don't understand why you think I do. I have stated very clearly that I don't like the universe target. > then I'm not sure how to approach > that mindset, maybe you can help me understand where you're coming from > on that? Where is the utility in it? Is there something I'm missing? You'll have to ask Poul-Henning, who wrote the universe target in the first place. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863ah8qarb.fsf>