Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:17:55 +0200 From: "Magnus Ringman" <bmr@google.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What do you think ?: How should pseundo terminals behave ... Message-ID: <4f674ca50609261017j780788b0o5672914c2b511b84@mail.google.com> In-Reply-To: <0C4B0125-11AA-4BDB-A4E3-163A6194AB68@alumni.cwru.edu> References: <20060926111452.J91466@godot.imp.ch> <0C4B0125-11AA-4BDB-A4E3-163A6194AB68@alumni.cwru.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/26/06, Justin Hibbits <jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu> wrote: > On Sep 26, 2006, at 05:33 , Martin Blapp wrote: > > So how should ptys behave ? > > 3.) Detect that there is no master around anymore and > > return ENXIO: > > > > # echo "BLUBBER" > /dev/ttypX > > # /dev/ttypX: Device not configured > > > > (easy to do, i've got a fix. IMHO this is the best thing to > > do. This allows fast error recovery in case the master > > has been gone away) > > Martin > > I vote #3, it makes the most sense. +1. Magnus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f674ca50609261017j780788b0o5672914c2b511b84>