Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:22:03 +0100 From: Jaeckel Joachim <Joachim.Jaeckel@mgi.de> To: "'Amancio Hasty'" <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: "'freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: something like video4linux the 2. (some thoughts...) Message-ID: <25BD834C7D47D311B46F002048401A634D94F5@MGHM0219>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What you want is more video capture device drivers for different = video > capture boards using the bt848 ioctl interface which is sufficiently general > to accomodate most video capture programs. Okay, I see the problems for existing ports, if there would be another interface to video-capture-boards, but (please don=B4t hit me) wouldn=B4t it be = easier for new programs (or existing programs from the linux-community) to port to = FreeBSD if we had v4l compatible devices? (Maybe I should take a closer look to the bt848 ioctl interface first, before I=20 post this, but I=B4m currently have no access to it.) Excuse me, these questions are not for discussing fundamental things of = the FreeBSD video capture device-driver part, it=B4s only for me to gather = some information, what would be the best way to implement a new video = capture board driver! Thanks in advance. Joachim Jaeckel. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25BD834C7D47D311B46F002048401A634D94F5>