Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:22:00 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 identcpu.c src/sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c Message-ID: <20051018152200.GD84920@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0510180047250.12093-100000@sea.ntplx.net> References: <435473D3.8080209@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0510180047250.12093-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:50:30AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Colin Percival wrote:
> > David O'Brien wrote:
> > > Why is this not clear?
> > >
> > > CPU: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2392.92-MHz K8-class CPU)
> ^^^^
...
> > This may be clear to *you*, but five years from now I'm sure that *I* won't
> > be able to remember what the AMD Opteron 280 is.
>
> Am I missing something? Would it still say "Dual" if it were not a
> dual core?
No it would not. I'm not sure what this added:
CPU: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2394.81-MHz K8-class
..
Cores per package: 2
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051018152200.GD84920>