Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 09:08:36 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: quickcam .. my kernel qcam driver fails to find it, but Message-ID: <199606260708.JAA11004@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <199606260220.TAA07513@shrimp.whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Jun 25, 96 07:20:33 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> xfqcam, running directly to the ports I guess, works fine.. > qcamcontrol of course cannot work as the driver did not probe, > so I have no command-line script drivable way of getting an image.. > > does anyone have any ideas? I didn't follow the thread up to now so I don't know why the kernel doesn't find the camera. I see no other way at the moment than taking pictures from the shell using qcamcontrol - I just tried it here (qcamcontrol -d 4 | pnmtotiff >file.tif ; xv file.tif). So why doesn't your kernel see the camera? I have: device qcam0 at isa? port "IO_LPT1" tty device lpt1 at isa? port? tty irq 7 vector lptintr And consequently: qcam0 at 0x378 on isa qcam0: unidirectional parallel port lpt1 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa lpt1 not probed due to I/O address conflict with qcam0 at 0x378 > > julian > --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606260708.JAA11004>