Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:15:39 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Bartek Rutkowski <robak@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r383138 - head/net-im/uTox Message-ID: <551EBCAB.9060803@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20150403160305.GA29223@FreeBSD.org> References: <201504031546.t33FkDRj029242@svn.freebsd.org> <20150403160305.GA29223@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/3/2015 18:03, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 03:46:13PM +0000, Bartek Rutkowski wrote: >> New Revision: 383138 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/383138 >> >> [...] >> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ USE_GITHUB= yes >> GH_ACCOUNT= notsecure >> GH_PROJECT= ${PORTNAME} >> GH_TAGNAME= ${GH_COMMIT} >> -GH_COMMIT= f24082d >> +GH_COMMIT= 15b1ad9 > > Bartek, you did read /usr/ports/CHANGES recently about GH_COMMIT (and whole > new GitHub magic), didn't you? > What's not clear to me is how long the transition phase from GITHUB_LEGACY to GITHUB is. It's implied that we should be changing these from LEGACY to the new URL, but what the ramifications if we don't? How long do we have? 1 month? 1 year? indefinitely? What's the downside of keeping the original style? I'm sure what Robak committed actually works. How long it will work, I have no idea. Maybe I missed that part. Has it been communicated? John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?551EBCAB.9060803>