Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:06:04 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu> To: =?us-ascii?Q?Kristof_Zelechovski?= <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> Cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: RE: return value of fprintf Message-ID: <17846.12908.302073.145442@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <002401c73efd$5db24280$1a01080a@POCZTOWIEC> References: <000401c73ed9$540afca0$1a01080a@POCZTOWIEC> <200701231339.l0NDdvF3046532@lurza.secnetix.de> <002401c73efd$5db24280$1a01080a@POCZTOWIEC>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:47:11 +0100, Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl> said: > And the behaviour in question is undefined > in the sense that the standard does not define > what happens when you a stream for I/O with the error indicator set; > however, it is not defined as undefined, either. The Standard is what the Standard says, not what it doesn't say. If the Standard is silent, the behavior is undefined. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17846.12908.302073.145442>