Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:29:50 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, olli@fromme.com, jilles@stack.nl Subject: Re: svn commit: r211023 - head/usr.sbin/syslogd Message-ID: <864of3y1fl.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20100809.095007.4959786895405928.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:50:07 -0600 (MDT)") References: <20100808.153608.1142818667055052395.imp@bsdimp.com> <20100808220631.GA86477@stack.nl> <86tyn4tbuc.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100809.095007.4959786895405928.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > I like the idea of a macro. Why is a cast through uintptr_t better? Without the uintptr_t cast, you'll get an error, or at least a warning, if the pointer is qualified (const and / or volatile). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864of3y1fl.fsf>