Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:07:52 -0800 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: Dillon Kass <lists@loveturtle.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ath if_ath.c if_athvar.h Message-ID: <45BD6508.8020007@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <B8958A12-01C8-4AFE-BD4E-55C8E62A198C@loveturtle.net> References: <002201c74295$3dc88420$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> <45BC2A68.9020507@errno.com> <B8958A12-01C8-4AFE-BD4E-55C8E62A198C@loveturtle.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dillon Kass wrote: > are we talking about "rates" here or are we talking about 5 and 10Mhz > wide channels? [context lost to top posting] The channels are indeed narrower (5 and 10MHz) but they also use reduced tx rates. This is required for the public safety band and I applied the same logic to the 900Mhz cards I've got as testing showed you get more effective operation w/ the reduced rates. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45BD6508.8020007>