Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:40:03 +0100 From: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@kukulies.org> To: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rum0 acting as an Access point (belkin router) 8.0 R Message-ID: <4B557DF3.7090900@kukulies.org> In-Reply-To: <3a142e751001181300o36c2156cx54eb47db073db7a7@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B507B9A.3050803@kukulies.org> <3a142e751001150817x7b4da53fs16cebd2e097890b4@mail.gmail.com> <4B547396.7070902@kukulies.org> <ce5f79aa1001180725k40ec87aer997f43c5d47d7684@mail.gmail.com> <1263831293.14794.14.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> <4B548C6A.4070909@kukulies.org> <3a142e751001180839q61003c56x835a76a4f6c4b742@mail.gmail.com> <4B5492AF.9060906@kukulies.org> <3a142e751001181300o36c2156cx54eb47db073db7a7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul B Mahol schrieb:
>
> Argh sorry, you need to use:
> create_args_wlan0="wlanmode hostap"
>
>
>
Yep, it works now:
rc.conf:
wlans_rum0="wlan0"
create_args_wlan0="wlanmode hostap"
network_interfaces="lo0 rl0 wlan0" # List of network interfaces (or "auto").
ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" # default loopback device configuration.
ifconfig_rl0="inet 172.27.4.219 netmask 255.255.248.0"
ifconfig_wlan0="inet 10.0.0.1/24 ssid OFFICE wepmode on wepkey
0xf00baaf00baaf00baaf00baaf0 weptxkey 1 channel 1"
defaultrouter="172.27.2.116"
ifconfig:
rum0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 2290
ether 00:11:50:cb:52:10
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g <hostap>
status: running
wlan0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
ether 00:11:50:cb:52:10
inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g <hostap>
status: running
ssid OFFICE channel 1 (2412 Mhz 11g) bssid 00:11:50:cb:52:10
country US authmode OPEN privacy ON deftxkey 1 wepkey 1:104-bit
txpower 0 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS dtimperiod 1 -dfs
>>
>> Hmm, should I throw the Belkin thing into the waste and buy something
>> else? I was hoping that 8.0 had changed it to the better a bit. But if
>> you are saying, rum(4) is still crappy...
>>
>
> Not rum(4) but chip.
>
>
Thanks for helping.
--
Christoph
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B557DF3.7090900>