Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 09:49:22 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dangerously Dedicated Message-ID: <20001119094922.C66448@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200011191657.eAJGvnZ63007@cwsys.cwsent.com>; from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca on Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 08:56:59AM -0800 References: <20001119083822.A39683@dragon.nuxi.com> <200011191657.eAJGvnZ63007@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 08:56:59AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> If/when dangerously dedicated goes away, will there be special
> provision for Zip and Jazz disks?
Why is there a need?
> Or, will we need to put an fdisk style partition table on Zip and Jazz
> disks, then slice them with disklabel?
What is wrong with doing this now that fdisk/disklabel has been fixed to
create proper slices?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001119094922.C66448>