Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:21:11 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kern/26466: devfs panics 
Message-ID:  <30297.986912471@critter>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2001 07:00:05 PDT." <200104101400.f3AE05V93426@freefall.freebsd.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200104101400.f3AE05V93426@freefall.freebsd.org>, Mikhail Teterin wr
ites:
>The following reply was made to PR kern/26466; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
>From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
>To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
>Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@FreeBSD.ORG,
>	jkh@FreeBSD.ORG
>Subject: Re: kern/26466: devfs panics 
>Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:57:54 -0400 (EDT)
>
> On 10 Apr, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <200104092206.f39M6FC17272@misha.privatelabs.com>, mi@aldan.algebra.
> > com writes:
> > 
> >>You mean this:
> >>	devfs on dummy_mount (devfs, local)
> > 
> > If you are using DEVFS in -stable, you are in for some (more)
> > serious trouble.
> > 
> > It basically doesn't work.
> 
> Well, this comment should go (back) into LINT then. I remember there
> being troubles with devfs and avoided it until now... I was hoping it
> would help me solve the problem I described. May be, the PR will bring
> it one step closer to working...

No, DEVFS in -stable is a dead-end.  The DEVFS i -current is a
rewrite and it will not be MFC'ed.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?30297.986912471>