Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 15:48:45 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lynx-current port is broken. Message-ID: <11511.933806925@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Aug 1999 14:50:52 PDT." <199908042150.OAA02164@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, unfortunately I am not the person to ask. :) The docproj port is Nik's baby and he could far better answer just why he used lynx-current rather than lynx. - Jordan > * From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> > > * The port is broken, trust me. Please fix it since I've disabled all > * doc distributions in releases until this happens. > > Did you get this mail? > > Satoshi > ------- > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:36:32 -0700 (PDT) > To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com > CC: ports@freebsd.org, ache@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: lynx-current port is broken. > From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) > > * From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> > > * Unfortunately, lynx-current is depended on by textproc/docproj and that > * in turn is depended on by the default make release rule. :) > > Why is docproj using lynx-current and not lynx? The whole point of > splitting lynx and lynx-current was to make the release *not* depend > on an unreliable port. > > -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11511.933806925>