Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:28:52 -0400 From: Pete C <junk@thechristies.net> To: <barbish@a1poweruser.com> Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Alternative to NATD or IPNAT for cable connection. Message-ID: <jUsT.aNoTheR.mEsSaGe.iD.103520695722537@thechristies.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sunday, 20 October 2002, "JoeB" <barbish@a1poweruser.com> wrote: >Help please, I looking for a software port that does NAT >(network address translation). Before getting cable I used user >PPP for dial up ISP with NAT function and then IPFW with >keep-state rules. This worked great because NAT was being done >outside of IPFW. Once I went to cable with DHCP I had to also go >to IPFW with NATD. NATD has problems with IPFW keep-state rules >where rules are mis-matched because of IPFW getting confused between >private and public ip address. > >Does anybody know of an stand-a-lone NAT program? > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > I had similar trouble when switching to cable . . . found this How-To helpful http://www.freebsd-howto.com/HOWTO/Ipfw-Advanced-Supplement-HOWTO PeteC This e-mail host does not accept spam (unsolicited e-mail). If you have a legitimate reason for contacting me, replace 'junk' with 'pete'. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?jUsT.aNoTheR.mEsSaGe.iD.103520695722537>