Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 09:16:08 +0100 (MET) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: nox@jelal.hb.north.de (Juergen Lock) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, babkin@hq.icb.chel.su, luigi@iet.unipi.it, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New PC-Emu (fwd) Message-ID: <199611070816.JAA10571@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <199611070715.IAA01961@saturn.hb.north.de> from "Juergen Lock" at Nov 7, 96 08:14:45 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Michael Smith writes: > > > Thanks Juergen for your diffs; I've incorporated those, and activated > > the bound instruction as well. If anyone finds any other inactive > > instructions, please let me know. > > It wasn't activated fully, this was missing: > > Index: instr.h > @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ > i_pop_di, /* 0x5f */ > i_notdone, /* 0x60 XXX */ > i_notdone, /* 0x61 XXX */ > - i_notdone, /* 0x62 XXX */ > + i_bound, /* 0x62 */ > i_notdone, /* 0x63 XXX */ > i_notdone, /* 0x64 XXX */ > i_notdone, /* 0x65 XXX */ > > (not that i've seen a program actually using it yet but you never know...) perhaps code generated by some pascal compiler with bound checks enabled ? I am under the impression that enter, leave and bound were introduced to get better support for Pascal. Luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611070816.JAA10571>