Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:19:08 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How is supposed to be protected the units list? Message-ID: <4B9A93AC.9020000@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <4B9A91DA.7030107@FreeBSD.org> References: <3bbf2fe11002281655i61a5f0a0if3f381ad0c4a1ef8@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe11003031357o518d6028m8157d9110a9122f3@mail.gmail.com> <4B8EF128.8050704@feral.com> <3bbf2fe11003031532u2207eb55h19c3a045215a7d84@mail.gmail.com> <4B8EF336.80107@feral.com> <3bbf2fe11003031547kd5f7314t3d83b2bde06c1c2f@mail.gmail.com> <4B8EF990.5030407@feral.com> <3bbf2fe11003031607wa3727b5ke89bc2a909d4d6a6@mail.gmail.com> <4B901419.8060800@feral.com> <3bbf2fe11003041737p30690522ya81e1b8f4bd6bbf9@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe11003120601y3c403a1ct50f9fc6c1f0903bf@mail.gmail.com> <4B9A91DA.7030107@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's a fair comment. There is at least one case where this additional lock has helped. It probably needs rethinking a little later, but for now it does seem to help people. > I have already told my opinion, that second lock may be not needed. I > would like to think a bit more about both patches after getting back > from the conference. Thanks, > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B9A93AC.9020000>