Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:21:46 +0100 From: Dario Freni <saturnero@freesbie.org> Cc: small@freebsd.org, rizzo@icir.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, rwatson@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ? Message-ID: <43DFFF1A.4050406@freesbie.org> In-Reply-To: <43DFD698.7040508@elischer.org> References: <3281.1138742578@critter.freebsd.dk> <43DFD698.7040508@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig98EF1275CBBEC52DE5A857BE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Julian Elischer wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >=20 >> In message <20060131.131654.134137067.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner >> Losh" writes: >> =20 >> >>> In message: <43DFC2D5.7040706@errno.com> >>> Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> writes: >>> =20 >> >> =20 >> >>> Since I've started working on the bring up on an ARM based board, I'v= e >>> been wanting something that is easy to work with and that worked. I >>> think it would help us a lot in the embedded space if we had somethin= g >>> integrated into the base OS to do this stuff. >>> =20 >> >> I agree. I think we need to be much more inclusive in our concept of >> a 'release' than we are now. >> >> As I see it, PicoBSD with its "additive" approach would cover the >> low-capacity (<32 MB ?) range, NanoBSD with its "subtractive" approach= >> takes over from there, FreeSBIE covers the "don't touch my disk" >> range and finally the full blown release as we know it. >> =20 >> >=20 > I'd like to see us take the freesbie release into the tree somewhere > (since it uses so many > ports, maybe in ports, or maybe in tools) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" Do you mean the livecd or the build toolkit? The toolkit only needs mkisofs as port (like release/ scripts do, afaik). Bye, Dario --=20 Dario Freni (saturnero@freesbie.org) FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc --------------enig98EF1275CBBEC52DE5A857BE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD3/8aymi72IiShysRAnCYAKDuLhArEQ2taebuatmLm8/U2vrLggCg2Sjx r5zkVygNMShiZHezUqzgJqk= =6Vus -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig98EF1275CBBEC52DE5A857BE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43DFFF1A.4050406>