Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:06:47 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGVkcm8gVGltw7N0ZW8=?= <pedro@dehumanizer.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? Message-ID: <4D49F197.5080304@dehumanizer.com> In-Reply-To: <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote: > What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and > configure. Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've seen people claim that it "can't be that good" since it's so easy to configure, with great defaults and human-readable config files, and "powerful means hard to configure".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D49F197.5080304>