Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:51:28 -0700 (MST) From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: doconnor@gsoft.com.au Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux Message-ID: <20080303.235128.41690803.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200803041701.36466.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <20080303.224256.635730757.imp@bsdimp.com> <200803041701.36466.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Subject: Re: Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:01:28 +1030 > On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > here's a set of diffs that will allow FreeBSD's usr.bin/make to build > > on Linux. I'm sure they are gross, and I don't plan to commit them > > (at least not all of them), but I thought I'd post them here to see > > what people think. > > > > I think that the extra config.h includes, the errc -> errx patches > > and the Makefile.dist patches may be good for the tree. The rest may > > not meet FreeBSD's source tree policies. > > > > Comments? > > I did this a while ago when porting some of our code to Linux because it > builds with pmake.. > > Your patches are much nicer than mine however :) I was in a hurry, since I thought I could do it in a half hour and that was faster than explaining things... > The tailq stuff could be shoved into a linux.h or some such.. So it's > more obvious what it's for and why it's there. I resisted creating a linux.h, but we'll likely need something akin to it. When I did some Mac OS X experimentation, I had extensions to legacy to smooth over the rough edges, but it is too early here. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080303.235128.41690803.imp>