Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:58:04 +0400 From: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@mail.ru> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About FreeBSD and Solaris Message-ID: <424B04CC.8060909@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <86oed2veqd.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20050326224344.4152110C83@relay2.beelinegprs.ru> <20050326233120.GA4611@gothmog.gr> <20050327124610.GA1609@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie> <ff0f76e00503270915280b6852@mail.gmail.com> <86oed2veqd.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Phil Brennan <phil.brennan@gmail.com> writes: > >>This mysql benchmark includes solaris 10 and freebsd 5.3. Its a month >>or two old now, but its the only one I've seen. Dag-Erling, how does >>this show solaris to be slow on x86? It certainly isn't slow compared >>to freebsd. > > > Please use something else than MySQL as benchmark, as MySQL has > well-known issues with FreeBSD's threading model. > > DES Latest talk on the Net suggests that freebsd is a perfect choice for mysql-based database, but you should compile it (mysql) with linux threads enabled. I think Yahoo has used mysql on freebsd for years on end. They have switched their core db units to linux-oracle, though. Andrew P.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?424B04CC.8060909>