Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 00:27:58 -0500 (EST) From: Robert N Watson <rnw+@andrew.cmu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freefall.FreeBSD.org Cc: terry@lambert.org, a.mondini@agora.stm.it, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBsd 2.0.5 installation with Windows 95 Message-ID: <wkaOVSW00YUw83b1N=@andrew.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199511030307.NAA11005@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> References: <199511030307.NAA11005@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Excerpts from internet.computing.freebsd-questions: 3-Nov-95 Re: FreeBsd
2.0.5 installat.. Michael Smith@atrad.adel (1072*)
> FAT is FAT. They mount fine, modulo the problems with the MSDOSFS as it
> stands.
BTW -- has anyone done any comparisons between the Linux MSDOSFS code
and the FreeBSD one to look for obvious differences that might result in
the corruption problems with the FreeBSD version?
----
Robert Watson (rnw+@andrew.cmu.edu) * Double major: IDS/CS * H&SS
http://www.watson.org/ robert@fledge.watson.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?wkaOVSW00YUw83b1N=>