Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Oct 2024 13:35:59 +0300
From:      Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>
To:        Yuri Victorovich <yuri@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org,  dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 72a99dd00b86 - main - misc/onnxruntime: New port: Cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing & training accelerator
Message-ID:  <CALH631mQS5aTvafEGeBf6pNr5U0hunoZW4-1gJQ0ADQfgEtS=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <202410070855.4978tknf062709@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
References:  <202410070855.4978tknf062709@gitrepo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:55=E2=80=AFAM Yuri Victorovich <yuri@freebsd.org>=
 wrote:
>
> +# this port is broken at least in some ways: it has missing symbols due =
to excessive
> +# and incorrect bundling, see https://github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/i=
ssues/22331
> +# it still might be useful for some purposes, hence static libraries are=
 installed instead of shared ones

I don't think this is worth committing then. Especially given the
amount of ports you're already maintaining.
I believe that a few quality ports is better than many broken ones.

Can you please give attention to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280689 and
https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main/2024-October/1241=
08.html
instead of piling up new ports of questionable usefulness?

P.S. We made a port of this software at $WORK that seemingly works and
can be used by consumers, so it certainly can be fixed.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631mQS5aTvafEGeBf6pNr5U0hunoZW4-1gJQ0ADQfgEtS=w>