Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:35:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207344] Grammar Fixes Message-ID: <bug-207344-9-bZ56a2A9AF@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-207344-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207344 Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org |wblock@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Warren Block <wblock@FreeBSD.org> --- Understood, I'm just saying the diff is malformed, showing that the entire file changed. That sentence has problems which our fallible human understanding of parentheses might not be able to cure. Put another way, there are at least two sentences worth of stuff crammed into that single sentence. So I split it up. This also avoids asides which divert the reader's attention. As far as "chrooted", there are several forms, each of which is uglier than the one before it, but of course only if you line them up that way. People sometimes jam an apostrophe in there. I personally find "chrooted" less ugly than the alternate forms. Here, it is not talking about the chroot(8) command, which could be marked up in DocBook as "<command>chroot</command>ed". It appears to me to be using it as an adjective, describing the environment created by chroot(8). That sentence does need another comma, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207344-9-bZ56a2A9AF>