Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:22:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Message-ID: <14838.3011.550779.139174@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <21367.972424567@winston.osd.bsdi.com> References: <imp@village.org> <200010241829.MAA17470@harmony.village.org> <21367.972424567@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan Hubbard writes: > [redirected to just -current; I'm not sure what this has to do with -net] > > I agree. I've been using them for a while on my dog slow Windows CE > > machine. There were some minor issues when they were first committed > > to NetBSD on some platforms (due to a too early use of ps and some > > brokeness in ps on pmax, for example), but these were quickly > > resolved. > So, who wants to do a proof-of-concept implementation for -current > which integrates with our existing rc.conf mechanism? In order to > obey POLA, we should at least have the separate scripts switch off the > same knobs whenever possible. I'm in the midst of trying to install NetBSD so I can look at this. If no one else steps forward to do it, I can put together a patch. <mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14838.3011.550779.139174>