Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 May 2000 19:15:07 +0100
From:      Tim Priebe <tim@polytechnic.edu.na>
To:        Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@outblaze.com>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Suggestion for testing FreeBSD as packet-filtering-router  performance
Message-ID:  <392ACAAA.8D0CAB93@polytechnic.edu.na>
References:  <20000523081035.16657.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:

> Hi, I have setup a small test harness consisting of 4 machines in the
> following config

[...]

> Right now, B has no rules on it so it is acting just as a router. I
> plan to add rules to it later on
>
> Subsequently I am going to replace B with a Watchguard and a Netscreen
> to see relative performance
>
> I am looking for some advice as to tools/techniques I can use to
> generate network traffic between the boxes.
>
> Regards, Yusuf
>
> --
> Yusuf Goolamabbas
> yusufg@outblaze.com

I believe you can set packet size, and total number of packets to send with tcpblast. I increased the maximum packet
count when I was testing the throughput on my switches.
If you add a rule at the end to allow the discard packets, you should be able to acess the maximum throughput you can
get in a worst case situation. I would suggest you do your initial test without routing, to get some idea of how that
compares to the routed and filtered tests.

Tim.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?392ACAAA.8D0CAB93>