Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 19:01:48 -0600 From: Oscar Bonilla <obonilla@fisicc-ufm.edu> To: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> Cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reply to field Message-ID: <19991104190148.A38726@fisicc-ufm.edu> In-Reply-To: <19991104185432.T602@holly.calldei.com> References: <199911050041.QAA49569@rah.star-gate.com> <19991104185432.T602@holly.calldei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 06:54:32PM -0600, Chris Costello wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > Curious, why is the reply field in the email header not set > > to the originating mailing list? Just thought that it will make > > it easier to reply to postings to the mailing lists so people don't > > get multiple copies of the same message. I don't have such > > problem because I have a mail filter which delete duplicate > > messages. > > a.) Your message is off-topic. Please don't post this sort of > thing to -current anymore. agreed. > b.) I think it's useful. When someone responds to me on the > list, I get a copy in my main mailbox and in the mailbox > where I keep messages for that list. > this has been discussed in depth on the mailing lists. search for it and you'll find pleny of reasons why to set/not set the reply to field. regards, -oscar -- For PGP Public Key: finger obonilla@fisicc-ufm.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991104190148.A38726>