Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:48:13 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: Ivo Vachkov <ivo.vachkov@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: divert rewrite Message-ID: <4D5173CD.3040808@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D501198.6090901@FreeBSD.org> References: <4D4DCD1E.1050906@freebsd.org> <AANLkTimtDegcGjzXatEOHjQR9GM_hD29ZiKnkT-zG1_S@mail.gmail.com> <4D4DFC95.9010804@freebsd.org> <4D501198.6090901@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
07.02.2011 18:36, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > 06.02.2011 4:42, Julian Elischer wrote: >> On 2/5/11 4:09 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> How can I help? >> >> if you have ipv6 connectivity and experience, I have no experience or >> connectivity, with it so >> I'll be coding blind and will need a tester. >> If you have an application for IPV6 testing that would be even better. >> Divert is often used for NAT but that doesn't seem very useful for >> IPv6 and >> natd doesn't support it anyhow. > > Object :) > Divert is really useful way to get packets from firewall to userspace, > analyse or process them some way and put them back. Really I see no > other way for this for IPv6. I've tried ng_socket+ng_nat but there is no > easy way to put a packet back in firewall. Oops, I meant ng_socket+ng_ipfw here.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D5173CD.3040808>