Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:38:50 -0300 From: Raimundo Santos <raitech@gmail.com> To: Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: dummynet/ipfw high load? Message-ID: <CAGQ6iC8oppSD8Vh%2BgjMR=NPUsPSFfXJfCUTPsw4unOZzRWg4UA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5347AEAA.9090801@smartspb.net> References: <5347AEAA.9090801@smartspb.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 April 2014 05:58, Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net> wrote: > NAT realized with pf nat, shaping with ipfw dummynet and traffic > accounting with ng_netflow via ipfw ng_tee. > Good time, Dennis. May I ask how much clients do you nat, shape and account? Why you do that with both engines (pf + ipfw)? Why not ipfw only with in-kernel NAT? Best regards, Raimundo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGQ6iC8oppSD8Vh%2BgjMR=NPUsPSFfXJfCUTPsw4unOZzRWg4UA>