Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 20:15:06 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030104182558.A11809@papagena.rockefeller.edu> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:25 PM 1/4/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >GCC 3.2.1 seems to perform around as well, on my code, as Intel's >compiler. Depends on your code. A program consisting mostly of function calls isn't going to be much of a challenge for any compiler. But try some serious nested loops, or floating point, and GCC generates about the most naive code you could imagine. You could do better dashing it off in assembly language. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0>